Here industrial food production has stripped away 1/3 of our nation's top soil, destroyed (and continues to destroy) tens of millions of acres of healthy living soil and its critical biological diversity, introduced synthetic chemicals into the environment which individually and collectively reduce both ecological and human health, pursues monoculture practices with GMO technologies without any idea of its long term impact on ecological and human health, made our food supply dependent on foreign energy, and relies on antibiotics (70% of all antibiotic use) to allow for the industrial production of genetically similar (or identical) animals.
Showing posts with label Genetic Engineering. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Genetic Engineering. Show all posts
Monday, May 11, 2009
Progress to what ...
Killing Us Softly: Cigarettes and Industrial Food
Monday, March 23, 2009
Organic vs GM ...
Too bad it's a contest, or perhaps a war, but the US corporate greed model makes it so. Otherwise we could scientifically determine and use the best of both. But that will never (at least in the foreseeable future) happen in the United States.
Here's an excellent post on the subject: To GM or Not To GM. Be sure to read the quoted material from Jill Richardson towards the end of the post.
Here's an excellent post on the subject: To GM or Not To GM. Be sure to read the quoted material from Jill Richardson towards the end of the post.
Sunday, February 22, 2009
Biotechnology companies don't want independent studies of their products ...
Who could have expected that the private gene manipulating companies would insist on prohibiting any study of their products not controlled by themselves? Couldn't be that they are afraid of the results and want to be in a position to censor any results they don't like?
I can see why some could start thinking that 'private sector' business is a problem when these private sector entities exert such potentially pernicious control over our food supply (not to mention private sector control of 'health care' that focuses on extreme profits rather than actual health issues and private sector manufacturing of toys and kitchen products that leach harmful chemicals and, and, and ...)
Of course, regulations and oversight, did at one time alleviate some private sector excesses. It would be encouraging to see a move in a direction of balance between the welfare of the many and the profit of the few.
-----
Added: A genetic engineering company prohibiting the study of its gene manipulated seeds is like a car manufacturer prohibiting anyone or any organization (eg Consumer Reports) testing vehicles which they purchase and reporting the results to the public on the characteristics of these vehicles. When you buy a vehicle, you don't sign a contract that prohibits you from learning about the product you just bought! Not that the manufacturers wouldn't like such an environment (one of the Japanese manufacturers did try to stop CR's reporting negative information about their products).
Congress needs to step in. Companies that effect the food supply must not be able to make up the rules to suit their own selfish interests.
Crop Scientists Say Biotechnology Seed Companies Are Thwarting Research.
"The growers’ agreement from Syngenta not only prohibits research in general but specifically says a seed buyer cannot compare Syngenta’s product with any rival crop. ...In other words, just eat our genetically modified foodstuffs and be quiet while our experiment on the world works itself out.
[ ... ]
"Dr. Shields of Cornell said financing for agricultural research had gradually shifted from the public sector to the private sector. That makes many scientists at universities dependent on financing or technical cooperation from the big seed companies. “People are afraid of being blacklisted,” he said. “If your sole job is to work on corn insects and you need the latest corn varieties and the companies decide not to give it to you, you can’t do your job".”
I can see why some could start thinking that 'private sector' business is a problem when these private sector entities exert such potentially pernicious control over our food supply (not to mention private sector control of 'health care' that focuses on extreme profits rather than actual health issues and private sector manufacturing of toys and kitchen products that leach harmful chemicals and, and, and ...)
Of course, regulations and oversight, did at one time alleviate some private sector excesses. It would be encouraging to see a move in a direction of balance between the welfare of the many and the profit of the few.
-----
Added: A genetic engineering company prohibiting the study of its gene manipulated seeds is like a car manufacturer prohibiting anyone or any organization (eg Consumer Reports) testing vehicles which they purchase and reporting the results to the public on the characteristics of these vehicles. When you buy a vehicle, you don't sign a contract that prohibits you from learning about the product you just bought! Not that the manufacturers wouldn't like such an environment (one of the Japanese manufacturers did try to stop CR's reporting negative information about their products).
Congress needs to step in. Companies that effect the food supply must not be able to make up the rules to suit their own selfish interests.
Today's QUOTES: | What the Daddy party, remember that Republican self assigned moniker, has turned into: If this is “daddy,” it’s the dad on the billboard who owes 10 years’ worth of child support and who bears facial scars from the misfortune of being hunched over the meth lab when it exploded. --ROLE REVERSAL by Ed, ginandtacos.com Banksters are indignant that they actually have to be accountable to anyone. They'd rather have to lay off entire floors of office workers than have to give back their precious penthouses. It's a very elite perspective. --How Dare You Hand Me $25 Billion Dollars! by dday, Hullabaloo ... One of the things that creeps me out about the political system’s response to the crisis so far – the insolvency of the banking system in particular – are the increasingly desperate attempts to maintain a phony façade of free markets and private enterprise, in an economy now utterly dependent on the federal safety net. I totally expected that from Hank Paulson and the Cheney Administration, but is Obama’s financial team really pressed from exactly the same Wall Street mold? [...] It’s not a good sign when societies routinely lie to themselves about such big, fundamental truths, which in turn suggests that toxic assets may not be the poison we most need to worry about ... --Chocolate Covered Cotton by billmon, dailykos.com |
Friday, August 3, 2007
Something the oil companies don't want ... at least not yet.
Here's an article about a company that aims to 'coax' fuel from bacteria.
To do this, the company is employing tools from the field of synthetic biology to modify the genetic pathways that bacteria, plants, and animals use to make fatty acids, one of the main ways that organisms store energy. Fatty acids are chains of carbon and hydrogen atoms strung together in a particular arrangement, with a carboxylic acid group made of carbon, hydrogen, and oxygen attached at one end. Take away the acid, and you're left with a hydrocarbon that can be made into fuel.
Labels:
Energy,
Environment,
Genetic Engineering
Friday, July 6, 2007
Worse than I thought ...
UPDATE (July 7, 2007): Here's an article with some basic information about genetic engineering (ge) and/or genetically modified organisms (gmo): The ABC's of GMO's
And if you are not already more terrified of your government than 'the terists' then you are not paying attention: Farm Bill Could Hamstring State Food Safety Agencies (via Pacific Views).
===============================
And if you are not already more terrified of your government than 'the terists' then you are not paying attention: Farm Bill Could Hamstring State Food Safety Agencies (via Pacific Views).
===============================
"Nearly three quarters of all processed foods contain genetically engineered ingredients, but you'd never know it by reading package labels."
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)